A flow that carves and then waits minutes on a settlement poll used to
commit the carve only after the whole flow resolved - an abort mid-wait
left burned inputs spendable locally and stranded the fresh outputs.
ensureExactAmount now reports a mutation-bearing carve through the new
FundOperationOptions.onCarve checkpoint the moment its outcome is known;
payWithBearers and transferBetweenMints thread it through.
Because the carve may now be committed before the flows' classification
rotates run, those rotations no longer rewrite carve.note in the result -
returned funds come back as a separate verified rotatedNote, so the
committed carve and the re-secured note can both be persisted. NWC's
payChangeset adapts to the rotatedNote field; its own commit timing is
unchanged (follow-up).
A split, merge or rotate whose answer is 'Invalid or already spent k1.'
may be the refusal of a retried request that already LANDED - believing
it strands the fresh outputs server-side and desyncs the wallet (the
input is burned at the mint but still spendable locally, so every later
operation fails). All three flows now probe a would-be output when a
refusal carries fresh secrets: live outputs are adopted (or surfaced
unverified when the probe can't tell), a genuine refusal still fails.
The redeem callback is a GET and HTTP stacks retry GETs, so a mint can
execute the first attempt and refuse the repeat as an already-spent input
(LUD-25 says SHOULD replay; real mints refuse). The kit attaches the fresh
output secrets to every refusal - probeMutationOutput tells a landed
mutation from a genuine refusal. The harness wrapper reproduces the retry
against the mock.
Review feedback: bind the claim answer to the secret that was polled
before building a note from it. The kit already guarantees this -
claimMintedNote returns the queried secret by construction and
fetchNoteInfo rejects a mismatched k1 echo - so the assert cannot trip
through the kit (and is therefore not separately testable); it exists so
a future kit regression fails loudly instead of tracking a wrong secret.
A named target needs no verify URL: the note appearing at the wallet's own
secret is the settlement proof, and it is claimed without a rotate. The
claim material carries the secret - and the unverified note at it - from
the start, so a melt settling after the poll budget is never a lost note;
the source-note oracle classification is unchanged.
lnurl-mint >= 0.4 refuses a mint quote without comment=sha256(secret) and
keys the note by that secret instead of the payment preimage. prepareMint
detects the capability per mint (commentAllowed >= 64 or mintToHash),
binds the quote to a wallet-drawn secret, and claimMintedNote polls the
note itself - no preimage, no rotate, since the secret never rode an
invoice. Mints that never advertised the capability get the byte-identical
old request and stay on the preimage path; a mint that took the hash but
credited the preimage is caught by the claim poll and rescued through the
quote's verify URL. The d.ts augments the conformance package's stale
published declarations for its comment-naming flags.
pollVerifyUntilSettled keeps its exact behavior and messages, reimplemented
on a generic pollUntil so flows that watch something other than a LUD-21
verify (a named mint output appearing) share the same backoff, budget and
abort semantics.